FxRanking
Find my matches
FxRanking

Pepperstone VS IC Markets Comparison

Time to read: 12 minutes

Updated on 10 Nov 2026

Posted: 22 Jun 2026

Australian comparison of Pepperstone and IC Markets: ASIC entities, Razor vs Raw Spread costs, deposit thresholds, platforms, withdrawal conditions and retail risks.

Features IC Markets Pepperstone
Deposit
200 USD
10 USD
Spread
Floating
Floating
Maximum Leverage
1000
1000
Regulation
ASIC, CySEC, FSA, SCB
ASIC, SCB, CySEC, DFSA, SCA, BaFin, CMA, FCA
Broker Type
ECN / STP
STP/ECN
Platforms
MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView, WebTrader
Pepperstone platform, MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView
Instruments
Forex Pairs, Indices, Commodities, Bonds, Stocks, Cryptocurrencies
Forex Pairs, Indices, Commodities, Cryptocurrencies, Stocks, ETFs
Deposit Methods
Bitcoin, Ethereum, Fasapay, Klarna, Mastercard, Neteller, PayPal, POLi, Skrill, Tether, Union Pay, USD Coin, Visa, Wire Transfer
Apple Pay, Google Pay, Mastercard, MPESA, Neteller, PayPal, POLi, Skrill, Tether, Union Pay, Visa, Wire Transfer
Withdrawal Methods
Mastercard, Neteller, PayPal, Skrill, Visa, Wire Transfer
Apple Pay, Google Pay, Mastercard, MPESA, Neteller, PayPal, POLi, Skrill, Tether, Union Pay, Visa, Wire Transfer
Offices
Cyprus, Australia, Bahamas, Seychelles
Cyprus, Australia, Bahamas, Germany, Kenya, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom
Pepperstone VS IC Markets Comparison

Overview

For an Australian retail trader, Pepperstone and IC Markets are two established ways to trade leveraged forex and CFDs, but the best choice depends on the account, platform and payment method rather than a headline zero-pip spread. Our comparison focuses on Pepperstone Group Limited (AFSL 414530) and International Capital Markets Pty Ltd (AFSL 335692), not unrelated overseas entities. Both offer a spread-only Standard account and a commission-based raw-spread option. For MetaTrader forex trading, their advertised US-dollar commissions are similar; Pepperstone offers an additional proprietary platform, while IC Markets explicitly separates its MetaTrader and cTrader Raw Spread pricing. Neither has been established as universally cheaper or faster in independently measured live trading. The risk is substantial: CFDs are leveraged contracts, not ownership of the underlying assets, and retail safeguards do not prevent losing the money invested.

Australian retail CFD comparisonPepperstone Group LimitedInternational Capital Markets Pty Ltd
Australian licenceASIC AFSL 414530ASIC AFSL 335692
Simple forex accountStandard: no separate margin-FX commission; spread inclusiveStandard MetaTrader: no separate FX commission; spreads from 0.8 pip
Raw-spread MetaTrader accountRazor: raw spread plus commission from US$3.50/standard lot/side, depending on currency/platformRaw Spread: US$3.50/standard lot/side for USD-based account
Other trading interfacesOwn web/mobile platform; MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView (account-specific)MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView (account-specific)
Advertised retail major-FX leverageUp to 30:1Up to 30:1
Published account/funding minimumDomestic bank transfer: no minimum; common e-payments $10; crypto listed $18Australian account overview lists US$200 starting deposit
Client-money and retail protectionSegregation and negative balance protection under Australian termsSegregation and negative balance protection under Australian terms
General support informationAustralian page advertises 24/7Australian help channels; 24/7 noted in Australian TradingView support guide

CFD risk: Forex and CFDs are leveraged derivatives. Prices can move rapidly, and Australian retail protections such as leverage limits and negative balance protection do not stop you from losing all funds in your trading account. You do not own the underlying asset. Check the relevant PDS and whether the product fits your circumstances.

 

Trust and Safety

Both Australian firms operate under ASIC financial-services licences, but a licence is not a promise of profits, perfect execution or a government guarantee of all deposited money. For Australian retail CFD accounts, the material protections include restrictions on leverage, margin close-out rules and negative balance protection. Those rules differ for wholesale or professional accounts. Do not rely on the FCA, CySEC or offshore licences held by other companies in either brand's wider group as evidence of the protections attached to an Australian contract. Before accepting any terms, look at the named contracting company, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Financial Services Guide (FSG) and Target Market Determination (TMD).

 

Pepperstone Regulation

Pepperstone Group Limited, ACN 147 055 703, is authorised by ASIC under AFSL 414530. Its Australian disclosure explains segregated retail client money and negative balance protection; however, segregated accounts do not eliminate trading losses or guarantee full recovery in a liquidation. Australian retail leverage is ordinarily capped at 30:1 on major currency pairs, with lower limits for other CFD markets. Pepperstone Pro and wholesale classification can change both leverage and available protections. The Australian terms, rather than licences held elsewhere in the Pepperstone group, are the appropriate starting point for this comparison. See Pepperstone's Australian client-protection explanation and the full Pepperstone review.

 

IC Markets Regulation

International Capital Markets Pty Ltd, ACN 123 289 109, holds ASIC AFSL 335692 for the Australian IC Markets service. The Australian regulatory page identifies that company and licence. The Australian CFD account terms and target market matter more than group-wide descriptions of other overseas licences. IC Markets says it segregates client money and provides negative balance protection for retail accounts; neither prevents an ordinary trading loss. Australian retail leverage on major forex pairs is capped at 30:1. The contract and protections for an Australian retail applicant must not be inferred from a Seychelles- or Cyprus-regulated affiliate. More context appears in the IC Markets review.

 

Security Features

Both Australian providers describe segregated client-money arrangements and account-security controls, but these safeguards address custody and operational risks rather than market losses. With negative balance protection, Australian retail clients should not owe more than the funds in the relevant CFD account after market gaps; they can still lose the entire balance. Stop-loss orders are not always filled at the specified price when liquidity is limited or markets gap. The comparison is most useful when both brokers are examined on identical assumptions: an Australian retail client, the same FX pair, the same trade size, the same account currency, the same platform family and the same holding period. For a wholesale client, compare a separate set of terms; the retail column below would not apply in full.

 

Trading fees: like-for-like beats the advertised minimum. Both brokers publish raw spreads from 0.0 pips, which is a possible low quote, not an average or an execution promise. IC Markets' Australian Raw Spread MetaTrader page reports an average EUR/USD spread of about 0.1 pip and commission of US$3.50 per standard lot per side on a USD-based account. Pepperstone's Australian Razor account publishes commission from $3.50 per lot per side; the exact charge depends on platform and account currency. Standard accounts do not separately charge forex commission but include a spread markup; for Pepperstone, share CFDs still attract commission. Overnight swaps, conversion charges, changing spreads and slippage can outweigh a small difference in base commission. Review Pepperstone's costs and IC Markets' Australian account comparison. FXRanking also maintains individual Pepperstone fee and IC Markets fee guides, whose details should be read alongside current primary-source terms.

Pepperstone fees. The Australian Standard account rolls margin-FX transaction charges into the spread and generally avoids separate FX commission, while the Razor account uses raw spread plus commission. Its pricing materials describe Razor commission from US$3.50 per standard forex lot per side, but cTrader, TradingView, MetaTrader and other account currencies need their own schedule. A one-pip Standard markup may matter less to a very occasional trader who values an uncomplicated statement than to a scalper taking many trades. For a Razor position, a quoted 0.0-pip minimum does not imply a zero-cost round trip. Share CFDs can carry commission on either account and swaps apply when eligible positions cross the daily rollover.

 

IC Markets Fees

IC Markets fees. The Australian MetaTrader Raw Spread account publishes US$3.50 commission per standard lot per side on a USD-denominated account ($7 round trip), with variable raw spreads. Its separate cTrader/TradingView Raw Spread option advertises $3 per US$100,000 per side ($6 round trip), so the platform and not just the account label affects the comparison. The Standard MetaTrader account advertises no separate forex commission and spreads from 0.8 pip. Its published EUR/USD average of 0.1 pip on Raw Spread is descriptive, not guaranteed for a particular session or trade. Use the current instrument-specific spread data and the correct currency schedule to evaluate your own volume. Neither model avoids overnight swap or slippage.

A worked forex-cost example (illustrative, not a live test). Assume EUR/USD, one 100,000-EUR lot, a USD-denominated MetaTrader raw account, entry and exit during the same session and a 0.1-pip combined quoted spread. A pip is roughly US$10 for this position, so 0.1 pip costs approximately $1; commission at $3.50 on each side adds $7. Illustrative total = about US$8 for either broker under these identical inputs, excluding slippage, overnight financing and currency conversion. A 0.5-pip actual spread instead would mean about $12, even without other costs. This is a mathematical illustration using posted commission schedules, not a claim of matched observed spreads or a performance ranking. A cTrader or AUD-denominated account requires a different commission calculation.

 

Deposit and Withdrawals

Deposit and withdrawal rules are especially easy to miscompare because an account opening minimum, an individual payment-method minimum and a broker's suggested starting balance are different things. Pepperstone's Australian funding table lists no minimum for domestic bank transfer, $10 for many electronic methods and $18 for crypto, not a universal $10 minimum. IC Markets' Australian account overview lists a US$200 starting deposit for its compared account types; method availability and amounts should be checked in the Australian secure client area, and other product-specific pages may describe different thresholds. Broker processing times are estimates; intermediary banks, payment providers and withdrawals checks can take longer. Neither broker guarantees that a payment will reach the receiving bank within the internal-processing estimate.

 

Pepperstone Deposit and Withdrawal Options

Pepperstone deposits and withdrawals. The Australian funding-method table shows no minimum domestic bank transfer, $10 minimums for cards, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller, Apple Pay, Google Pay, BPAY and PayID, plus a separately listed $18 crypto minimum. This is a method-specific payment threshold, not proof that the account requires $10 to open. The same broker's Australian withdrawal page describes mostly free methods and estimated internal processing. However, its Australian support information specifically mentions a $20 charge on international bank-wire withdrawals, a material exception to any blanket 'no fees' claim. Your bank or payment service may charge separately. Withdrawals generally return to a payment source in the account holder's name, subject to compliance checks.

 

IC Markets Deposit and Withdrawal Options

IC Markets deposits and withdrawals. The Australian funding page lists cards, bank transfers and several e-wallet options, but what appears in a particular customer's portal depends on method and currency. IC Markets states it does not charge additional deposit or withdrawal fees while warning that international and intermediary banks may charge. Its withdrawal instructions say requests submitted before noon AEST/AEDT are normally processed on receipt day and later requests on the following business day; those are broker-side schedules, not delivery guarantees. International wires may take up to 14 days, while card payments can take several business days. Withdrawals normally return through the original funding source first and only to a matching name. The US$200 account-overview figure should not be confused with a cost deducted from the deposit.

 

Tradable Instruments

The useful question is which instruments are available to the Australian account and on your selected platform. Both brokers offer currency CFDs, equity-index CFDs, commodity CFDs, share CFDs and some cryptocurrency-linked CFDs, subject to product rules and changing availability. Pepperstone's Australian account page lists forex, index, share, commodity, ETF and crypto CFDs; its numerical instrument counts carry a stated data date and may change. IC Markets' Australian product menu also includes bond and other CFD classes. Neither broker automatically provides ownership of shares or cryptocurrencies through a CFD. If share ownership is the objective, distinguish IC Markets' separately marketed Australian share-trading service from its leveraged CFD account rather than treating them as the same product.

 

Pepperstone Instruments

Pepperstone instruments. Pepperstone's Australian Standard and Razor accounts both advertise access to forex and index CFDs, commodity and metal CFDs, share CFDs, ETF CFDs and crypto CFDs. Availability differs by exchange, product and platform. The Australian account page provides a dated instrument breakdown rather than a permanent promise of an exact number. Traders who need specific ASX shares, an ETF CFD or a crypto contract should check the exact symbol, trading hours, spread, minimum volume and relevant PDS. Share CFDs may have their own commission; margin financing and overnight charges can make buy-and-hold exposure expensive. The Pepperstone review gives broader product context.

 

IC Markets Instruments

IC Markets instruments. IC Markets Australia advertises forex and CFDs on indices, commodities, shares, cryptocurrencies and bonds among its market categories. Its account comparison lists 61 currency pairs on the featured MetaTrader and cTrader account types; counts and supported markets can change. A security appearing in a broker-wide product catalogue is not proof it can be traded in every Australian platform configuration or under every client classification. Check the active symbols and market hours, especially if a strategy uses index or share CFDs outside ordinary sessions. IC Markets' separate share-investing offering should be evaluated under its own disclosure rather than counted as CFD share ownership.

Both firms support MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 for algorithmic trading and cTrader for traders who prefer that order-entry interface. Choosing the same platform matters for a genuine cost comparison, because advertised raw-spread commissions and available instruments can change between MetaTrader, cTrader and TradingView. A demo can help assess interface and order types, but it is not proof of real-money execution, spreads during news or withdrawal quality. Neither firm's promotional latency or execution-speed statements constitute an independently repeated comparison here. Consider whether automated strategies need MT4 Expert Advisors, MT5's programming environment or cTrader's own automation tools before choosing an account.

 

Pepperstone Platforms

Pepperstone platforms. Pepperstone's Australian material identifies its own web/mobile platform as well as MT4, MT5, cTrader and TradingView integrations. Its detailed account table presents different platform eligibility for Standard and Razor, so a preferred interface can determine the applicable account and commission schedule. MetaTrader users can use Expert Advisors; cTrader has a different automation ecosystem, while TradingView may appeal to chart-focused discretionary traders. Check whether a given integration supports the exact instrument, order type and account classification needed rather than relying on a site-wide platform list. The proprietary app is a genuine selection difference for traders who do not want to rely entirely on third-party terminals.

 

IC Markets Platforms

IC Markets platforms. IC Markets Australia's Raw Spread offerings distinguish MetaTrader 4/5 from cTrader and TradingView. The current account comparison lists MetaTrader Raw at $3.50 per standard lot per side and cTrader Raw at $3 per US$100,000 per side, so matching 'Raw Spread' labels alone is not enough. MT4 and MT5 support Expert Advisors; cTrader uses a different coding environment and interface. Traders who already have automated scripts should check strategy compatibility, VPS requirements, symbol suffixes and back-testing assumptions before moving brokers. The published platform availability supports a feature comparison, not a claim that either platform fills orders faster in live market conditions.

 

Account Types

For Australian CFD clients, the clearest common comparison is Pepperstone Standard versus IC Markets Standard, or Pepperstone Razor versus IC Markets Raw Spread MetaTrader. The first pair favours easy-to-read spread-inclusive forex costs; the second makes explicit commission and variable raw spread more important. IC Markets also has a separate cTrader/TradingView Raw Spread schedule, while Pepperstone offers its own platform. Do not treat swap-free eligibility, account currency, lot sizing or professional leverage as uniform for every applicant. Both provide micro-lot trading on supported forex instruments, but a micro-lot trade is a size, not proof of a distinct 'Micro account' product. For many Australian readers, available cash, swap policy and intended strategy matter more than the number of account labels.

 

Pepperstone Account Types

Pepperstone accounts. The Australian site describes two main CFD pricing accounts: Standard and Razor. Standard incorporates most forex transaction charges in the spread; Razor applies raw forex spread plus commission. The broker also discusses swap-free arrangements where eligible, but this should not be treated as a third general pricing account with identical eligibility. The Australian page lists retail leverage up to 30:1 on major forex, with different terms for qualifying professional clients. To check differences in platform access, gold commissions and base currencies, use the current Australian account specification and our Pepperstone account guide.

 

IC Markets Account Types

IC Markets accounts. The Australian account overview distinguishes Standard MetaTrader, Raw Spread MetaTrader and Raw Spread cTrader/TradingView, with different spread/commission configurations. The account table lists US$200 as a starting deposit, micro-lot trading of 0.01 where supported and retail leverage up to 30:1 on major FX. Its Islamic or swap-free feature is subject to separate eligibility/terms; the Australian overview does not establish a standalone Micro account as the comparison currently suggests. Traders looking to use a small trade size should check minimum lot and margin, not assume a separate account product. Our IC Markets account guide provides further background.

 

Customer Support

Neither broker should win a customer-service comparison on an unverified response-time claim. Pepperstone's current Australian contact page advertises 24/7 support, so the older '24/5 only' comparison is outdated. IC Markets has telephone, email and contact channels on its Australian site and Australian TradingView help material describing 24/7 assistance; that does not prove that specialist trading, compliance and payment teams all operate around the clock. Users trading outside Australia business hours should distinguish general live chat from withdrawals and account-verification processing. For a meaningful comparison, verify availability for the exact account and issue, and consider asking each provider about payment delays, platform incidents or margin requirements before funding.

Pepperstone Support

Pepperstone support. Pepperstone currently lists 24/7 assistance on its Australian contact page, alongside local telephone and email channels. This corrects the previous description of weekday-only support. The listing describes access, not measured response times or guaranteed resolution for complex requests. Funding issues can also depend on third-party banks and on compliance teams that may operate to different schedules. For an Australian trader with positions open outside Sydney office hours, confirmation of the applicable emergency-trading contact is more important than a generic service award.

 

IC Markets Support

IC Markets support. IC Markets Australia publishes contact channels and support information at its Australian contact page. Its Australian TradingView connection guide advertises help available 24/7, but this does not demonstrate a faster reply or weekend processing of withdrawals. In fact, the Australian withdrawal guidance schedules certain actions on business days. Both brokers therefore appear able to provide around-the-clock general assistance, while availability of specialist teams and service quality remain separate questions. No dated phone, email or chat response-time study was available for this comparison, so neither can be given a measured service advantage.

 

Conclusion

Which broker is better in Australia? For a Standard MetaTrader user, both offer spread-inclusive FX pricing; assess actual symbol spreads and the platform you prefer. For a frequently trading MetaTrader Razor/Raw user, the advertised USD commission for one standard forex lot is close enough that live spreads, fill quality, swap rates and account-currency conversions become the deciding costs. Pepperstone may suit someone who wants a proprietary platform plus external integrations or a low-threshold domestic bank-transfer funding method. IC Markets may suit an active trader who wants a distinct cTrader Raw commission schedule or particular CFD symbols.

Neither wins automatically on '0.0 pips', raw instrument counts, a promotion or a guaranteed support response. Compare Australian entity terms and target-market documents before opening an account, then read the Pepperstone Review and IC Markets Review for separate detail. Risk reminder: leveraged forex and CFDs can lose your entire deposited capital; the negative-balance rule for retail accounts does not make the trade safe.

How this comparison was made. The reference case is an Australian retail CFD client; sources are the Australian licence, account, funding, support and withdrawal pages for each provider, checked in November 2026, and the existing FXRanking page. We compare broker-published schedules, not individually executed trades, platform benchmarks or a sampled spread record. Headline spreads are minima or broker-published averages where identified. Currency conversions, swaps and actual execution can change total charges. The company under the agreement and the current PDS/TMD remain decisive. This comparison is general information and does not assess an individual's suitability for leveraged derivatives.

FAQs

Which broker is better for active traders, Pepperstone or IC Markets?

For MetaTrader-based active forex trading, both publish raw-spread pricing with commission from about US$3.50 per standard lot per side on USD-denominated accounts. Neither is proven cheaper or faster in actual trades. Compare live spreads, slippage, swaps, your account currency and preferred platform. IC Markets also quotes a different cTrader/TradingView Raw commission schedule.

Which broker offers better account types?

Pepperstone Australia describes two main CFD pricing accounts, Standard and Razor. IC Markets Australia lists Standard MetaTrader, Raw Spread MetaTrader and Raw Spread cTrader/TradingView configurations. Both support small position sizes on eligible instruments; a micro-lot does not require a separate named Micro account. Swap-free options need eligibility checks.

Which broker has better customer support?

Pepperstone’s Australian support page currently advertises 24/7 service, rather than the 24/5 hours previously stated. IC Markets provides Australian contact channels and describes 24/7 assistance in its Australian TradingView support guide. These listings do not prove comparative response speed or weekend payment-processing availability.

Jake Robins Author FxRanking

Jake Robins

Author Profile

Jake Robins is a Forex and cryptocurrency education contributor with over 10 years of experience helping readers better understand the financial markets. His work covers risk management, technical analysis, trading psychology, broker platforms, and scam awareness. Through clear, practical guidance, Jake helps traders approach the markets with greater discipline, caution, and confidence.

Leave Your Comment

Name:

Email:

Comment:

Other Articles

Interactive Brokers versus Trading 212 comparison for UK investment accounts, costs, ISA and pensions

Interactive Brokers vs Trading 212 UK: Fees, ISA, SIPP & Trading

Compare Interactive Brokers and Trading 212 for UK shares, ETFs, ISA/SIPP accounts, trading charges, currency conversion, platforms and forex CFD risks.

eToro versus Trading 212 UK comparison of investing accounts, ISAs, trading fees and CFD risks

eToro vs Trading 212 UK: Stocks, ISA, Forex CFDs & Fees

Compare eToro and Trading 212 for UK investors: actual stocks and ETFs versus CFDs, Moneyfarm and Trading 212 ISAs, currency conversion charges and trading-platform limits.