News

US, Canada delay Gordie Howe bridge opening after Trump objects

Posted on: Jun 12 2026

The delay is unlikely to move broad markets but adds to a pattern of Trump-era trade friction with Canada, alongside tariff hikes and threats not to renew the trade deal with Mexico and Canada. For cross-border freight and logistics operators, a further postponement of capacity relief on the busiest US-Canada freight corridor extends existing bottleneck costs, though officials frame the delay as a matter of weeks rather than a structural setback.

---

The US and Canada have delayed the opening of the $4.7bln Gordie Howe bridge between Detroit and Windsor after Trump raised objections, with PM Carney saying Canada agreed to take more time to resolve outstanding issues.

Summary: Source: Reuters

  • US and Canada delayed the opening of the $4.7 billion Gordie Howe International Bridge connecting Detroit and Windsor, originally set for Friday
  • Canadian PM Mark Carney said Canada agreed to the delay at the request of the Trump administration to resolve outstanding issues
  • Windsor Mayor Drew Dilkens said Canada need not act subserviently to secure the opening
  • US officials including ambassador Pete Hoekstra and Commerce Secretary Lutnick are leading talks with Canada
  • Trump in February cited Canadian alcohol shelf rules, dairy tariffs and China trade talks as reasons he might block the bridge
  • Rival Ambassador Bridge owner Matthew Moroun met Lutnick in February after donating $1 million to a Trump-aligned PAC, prompting Democrat criticism
  • The bridge is expected to ease truck traffic and save truckers an estimated $2.3 billion over 30 years

The United States and Canada have delayed the opening of the $4.7 billion Gordie Howe International Bridge connecting Detroit and Windsor, Ontario, after President Trump raised fresh objections, just days before a planned ribbon-cutting ceremony.

The Windsor-Detroit Bridge Authority said the two countries agreed to take the necessary time to resolve outstanding issues, without specifying details. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney confirmed Canada agreed to the delay at the request of the Trump administration, describing a few weeks as time well spent given the bridge's decades-long lifespan. Windsor Mayor Drew Dilkens struck a firmer tone, saying Canada need not act subserviently to secure the opening.

US officials, including ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, are said to be leading discussions on resolving the impasse. Trump had earlier cited Canada's alcohol shelf policies, dairy tariffs and trade talks with China as potential grounds for blocking the crossing.

The delay also draws attention to Matthew Moroun, owner of the rival Ambassador Bridge, who met Lutnick in February after donating $1 million to a Trump-aligned political committee, prompting Democratic lawmakers to question his influence.

Once open, the bridge is expected to ease congestion on the Ambassador Bridge, the busiest freight crossing on the US-Canada border, cutting crossing times and saving truckers an estimated $2.3 billion over 30 years.

Given the pattern of last-minute reversals on Trump-branded deals lately, don't be too surprised if this "delay" eventually earns its own acronym. Gordie Howe TACO Bridge?

This article was written by Eamonn Sheridan at investinglive.com.
Options Brief - Broadcom shock, rotation wins - 5 June 2026

Posted on: Jun 06 2026

Broadcom's post-earnings plunge highlighted a growing gap between strong AI fundamentals and investor expectations. While the Dow closed at a record high thanks to strength in financials and healthcare, options flow pointed to increasing institutional demand for downside protection in small caps, semiconductors, and crypto-related names.

Options Brief - Broadcom shock, rotation wins - 5 June 2026

Broadcom’s AI chip guidance miss triggered a sharp rotation from tech into financials and value, setting up a vol event as May Non-Farm Payrolls land at 14:30 CET.

Thursday’s session delivered a rotation story rather than a market breakdown. Broadcom beat on revenue but disappointed on forward AI chip guidance, sending the stock down approximately 14% and pulling the broader semiconductor complex lower. Capital moved swiftly into financials, healthcare, and value names — lifting the Dow Jones Industrial Average to a record close while the Nasdaq 100 underperformed. For options traders, the more telling signal sits not in the index headline but in the term structure and in yesterday’s confirmed-opening flow, which showed broad-based institutional demand for downside protection across small caps, large-cap tech, and crypto proxies.

Headline driver

Broadcom’s fiscal Q2 report beat on revenue ($22.19bn vs. $22.13bn consensus) but fell short on forward AI chip guidance — Q3 AI chip sales projected at $16bn, below analyst estimates of approximately $17.2bn — sending the stock down approximately 14% on Thursday and triggering a broad semiconductor sell-off. Capital rotated swiftly into financials, healthcare, and value names, lifting the Dow Jones Industrial Average to a record close while the Nasdaq 100 underperformed.

Market snapshot

S&P 500 closed +0.41% at 7,584.31 — a headline number that conceals the degree of internal rotation. The Dow Jones Industrial Average surged +1.73% to a record 51,567.17, while the Nasdaq 100 slipped -0.53% to 30,407.81. The Russell 2000 added +1.45% to 2,935.33, reflecting broad appetite for non-AI cyclicals. US 10-year yields eased to 4.465% (-2.2 bps). As of writing, S&P 500 futures are down approximately 0.56% and Nasdaq 100 futures are off 1.12%, as the Broadcom shock continues to weigh on Asian equity markets ahead of this afternoon’s May Non-Farm Payrolls report (14:30 CET).

Data source: Saxo platform, as of 4 June 2026 close.

Market regime: Low vol bull — VIX 15.74, 20-day realised vol 8.9% (stable), S&P 500 +6.22% above its 50-day moving average.

Options flow sentiment

Based on end-of-day 4 June 2026 — yesterday’s positioning, not today’s price action.

Confirmed-opening single-name flow leaned defensively across semiconductors, large-cap tech, and crypto proxy equities, with put premium outweighing call interest in chip names, mega-cap software, and crypto-linked stocks — suggesting a broad hedging or repositioning bias rather than outright directional panic. Index and ETF flow reinforced that read, with substantial confirmed-opening put structures in IWM across multiple expiries pointing to active institutional demand for small-cap downside protection, while near-dated put activity in Bitcoin-linked ETFs remained difficult to classify cleanly given deep-ITM execution and ambiguous trade intent.

Options angle

VIX closed at 15.74 (+2.21%), mildly elevated but consistent with the low-vol bull regime. The more informative read sits in the term structure: VIX1D printed at 10.59 — indicating the market was not pricing a large overnight event into Thursday’s close — while front-month VIX futures settled near 17.30, a roughly 155-basis-point premium over spot. With May Non-Farm Payrolls releasing at 14:30 CET this afternoon, that futures premium reflects calendar risk from the upcoming CPI print (10 June) and FOMC meeting (16–17 June) rather than immediate session fear. SKEW closed at 142.15 (+3.87%), at elevated levels, indicating continued demand for OTM downside protection even as headline VIX remained contained. The gap between implied vol (VIX at 15.74) and 20-day realised vol (8.9%) is notable — IV is running at approximately 1.8x realised, a historical environment where premium-selling structures have tended to be more competitive relative to premium-buying alternatives once a near-term catalyst resolves.

Strategy insight – Post-event iron condor on an index. With implied volatility running at approximately 1.8x recent realised vol and the VIX1D at just 10.59 heading into this afternoon’s NFP release, the vol-selling window typically opens after the data print rather than before. An iron condor — selling an OTM call spread and an OTM put spread simultaneously — profits when the underlying stays within the short strikes through expiry and may capture the IV compression that tends to follow a resolved macro event. Structuring the trade after the data removes the directional binary of the release itself while retaining access to the vol premium that built ahead of it. The maximum loss occurs if the underlying makes a large move beyond either short strike: one side of the condor moves into-the-money, and the position can lose up to the width of the affected spread, minus the net premium collected. Important note: The strategies and examples provided in this article are purely for educational purposes. They are intended to assist in shaping your thought process and should not be replicated or implemented without careful consideration. Every investor or trader must conduct their own due diligence and take into account their unique financial situation, risk tolerance, and investment objectives before making any decisions. Remember, investing in the stock market carries risk, and it’s crucial to make informed decisions.

Strategy insight – Put debit spread as a cost-efficient hedge in a high-SKEW environment. SKEW at 142 reflects above-average demand for OTM downside protection, a level that tends to inflate the premium cost of outright put purchases relative to a neutral-skew baseline. A put debit spread — buying a closer-to-the-money put and simultaneously selling a further-OTM put at a lower strike in the same expiry — preserves directional downside exposure while reducing the net premium paid against that elevated skew. This structure is most relevant where a hedger has a specific downside level in mind rather than an open-ended tail view. The maximum loss is limited to the net debit paid for the spread if the underlying stays above the long put strike at expiry; maximum gain is capped at the difference between the two strikes, minus the net premium paid.

Conclusion

Thursday’s session delivered a rotation story, not a market breakdown: Broadcom’s AI guidance miss absorbed some excess in semiconductor valuations while financials, healthcare, and value names picked up the capital. Today’s May NFP print is the next variable — it arrives at 14:30 CET with index futures already pointing lower and Asian markets under significant pressure, so the directional outcome of the data could amplify or reverse the current pre-market setup. For options traders, managing exposure through the event rather than ahead of it remains the more defensible posture.

This content is marketing material and should not be regarded as investment advice. Trading financial instruments carries risks and historic performance is not a guarantee of future results. The Author is permitted to wait at least 24 hours from the time of the publication before they trade the instruments themselves. The instrument(s) referenced in this content may be issued by a partner, from whom Saxo receives promotional fees, payment or retrocessions. While Saxo may receive compensation from these partnerships, all content is created with the aim of providing clients with valuable information and options. This content will not be changed or subject to review after publication.
Related articles/content             
Options Brief - Streak snaps payrolls loom - 4 June 2026 Options Brief - Chip surge new SP record - 3 June 2026 Options Brief - Tech records oil whipsaw - 2 June 2026 Options Brief - Snowflake and AI lift records - 29 May 2026 Options Brief - Iran oil swing Dow record - 28 May 2026 Options Brief - Nasdaq clears 30000 - 27 May 2026 Options Brief - Hormuz hopes douse oil - 26 May 2026 Options Brief Nvidia beats KOSPI surges 21 May 2026 Options Brief - All eyes on NVDA - 20 May 2026
More from the author             
  • Koen Hoorelbeke's articles on Saxo
  • Follow and interact with me on X (Twitter) for more intraday content
Koen HoorelbekeInvestment and Options StrategistSaxo Bank
Topics: Options Thought Starters Investing with options Highlighted articles Listed Options Income investor – Options What are your options Learn about options Options education Getting Started with Options En hurtig tanke
Copper rally faces tariff roulette, but fundamentals remain tight

Posted on: Jun 05 2026

Stretched, tight and increasingly strategic

Key points:
  • Copper is moving from being “Dr Copper” to “strategic copper”. It still reflects global growth, but it increasingly reflects energy security, industrial policy and infrastructure resilience.
  • Mine supply remains the market’s weak link as the repeated disruption of large, complex mines has exposed a market where replacement supply is slow, capital intensive and operationally vulnerable
  • A widening COMEX-LME spread is once again pulling metal across the Atlantic as US tariff speculation becomes a global tightening mechanism
  • Grid investment, AI data centres, EV infrastructure, defence capex and energy security all point to copper demand that may prove less price-sensitive than traditional construction or white-goods demand.

Copper has extended its rally in 2026, trading around 14% higher year-to-date and roughly one-third above levels seen a year ago. While the magnitude of the move has raised concerns about demand destruction and speculative excess, the underlying story continues to strengthen. Mine supply is struggling to keep pace with demand, smelters are fighting over scarce concentrate, strategic stockpiling remains widespread, and US tariff uncertainty is pulling metal away from the rest of the world.

At the same time, copper demand is becoming increasingly tied to strategic sectors such as power infrastructure, electrification, artificial intelligence, and defence. This shift may not eliminate the commodity’s traditional cyclical tendencies, but it is helping create a market where demand is potentially less sensitive to economic slowdowns and high prices than in previous cycles.

As a result, copper increasingly finds itself at the intersection of industrial growth, energy security, technological expansion, and geopolitical competition.

Supply remains the market’s weak link

The bullish copper narrative ultimately begins with supply, and here the market continues to face challenges. After major disruptions at Grasberg and Kamoa-Kakula contributed to an estimated 1.5 million tonnes of lost production in 2025, supply disappointments have continued this year. Downgrades from major producers, lower production guidance in Chile, and slower-than-expected recoveries at several key operations have kept the market on edge. Industry estimates suggest supply disruptions have already removed around 450,000 tonnes from expected production this year.

The problem is not necessarily a lack of resources. Rather, it is the increasing difficulty of bringing new supply online quickly and efficiently. Large copper projects require significant capital investment, long development timelines, complex permitting processes, and stable operating environments. At the same time, ore grades continue to decline at many mature operations, increasing production costs and reducing operational flexibility.

The result is a market where supply growth remains persistently vulnerable to disruptions, delays, and underperformance.

Negative treatment charges signal extreme tightness

One of the clearest signs of stress within the copper supply chain can be found in the treatment charge market. Treatment charges, the fees miners pay smelters to process concentrate into refined metal, have collapsed to deeply negative levels, with spot assessments recently heard around minus USD 115 to 118 per tonne.

While treatment charges are often overlooked outside the industry, they provide one of the clearest real-time indicators of concentrate availability. Negative treatment charges effectively signal that smelters are competing aggressively for feedstock because there is simply not enough concentrate available.

The collapse reflects the combination of weaker mine production, delayed project ramp-ups, and constrained scrap availability. Chinese refined copper production has already shown signs of slowing, and further downside risks remain if concentrate shortages persist.

For now, strong sulphuric acid prices are helping support smelter margins and reducing the risk of widespread production cuts. However, they do little to change the underlying message: the bottleneck remains firmly upstream at the mine level.

Falling TC charges and SHFE stockpiles underpin tight supply story - Source: Bloomberg & Saxo

Copper demand is becoming increasingly strategic

Historically, copper has been viewed as one of the purest indicators of global economic activity. Its widespread use across construction, manufacturing, and consumer goods earned it the nickname “Dr Copper”. That relationship still matters, but the composition of demand is changing.

An increasing share of future copper demand growth is expected to come from power generation, transmission infrastructure, electric vehicles, battery systems, artificial intelligence data centres, and defence-related spending. Much of the copper demand associated with AI is indirect, driven not by the servers themselves but by the enormous investments required in grids, substations, transformers, and power distribution systems.

At the same time, governments across Europe and North America are increasingly viewing electricity networks as critical national infrastructure. Ageing grids, electrification targets, and energy security concerns are driving investment programmes that are likely to extend well beyond the normal business cycle.

This evolution matters because these sectors tend to be less sensitive to economic slowdowns and high commodity prices than traditional cyclical demand sources such as housing, appliances, and consumer electronics. In short, copper demand is increasingly being driven by the need to generate, move, store, and secure electricity.

Tariffs are distorting the global market

Another major theme that has supported copper last year and again recently has been the growing divergence between the US and the rest of the world. The at times widening premium of COMEX copper over London Metal Exchange prices has created a powerful incentive for metal to flow into the United States ahead of a potential decision on refined copper import tariffs.

As a result, the United States has attracted significant volumes of refined copper imports that does not reflect its relative small share of  overall global demand, so while inventories build in the U.S. availability is reduced elsewhere, tightening conditions across the rest of the market.

The upcoming US Commerce Department report, due by the end of June, represents a potentially important catalyst. A recommendation supporting future tariffs could encourage further inventory accumulation ahead of implementation, while a decision not to proceed could trigger an unwinding of the current premium and some temporary pressure on prices.

For now, however, tariff uncertainty continues to act as a tightening mechanism for the global market.

COMEX and London Copper priced in cents per pound - Source: Bloomberg & Saxo

Strategic stockpiling may be creating a higher price floor

Visible inventories have increased this past year, particularly in COMEX warehouses. On the surface, this might appear inconsistent with the bullish supply narrative. However, inventory levels increasingly reflect strategic behaviour rather than pure market fundamentals.

The concentration of metal in the United States ahead of a possible tariff regime highlights how policy considerations are influencing inventory decisions. At the same time, strategic stockpiling by governments, industrial users, and supply-chain managers appears to be limiting the amount of copper available to the wider market. It highlights an emerging trend with consumers of key commodities, such as copper, moving from a "just in time" to a "just in case" strategy.

This development may help explain why copper prices continue to remain elevated despite periodic signs of slower physical demand. The market is increasingly assigning value to security of supply, not simply immediate consumption needs.

Technical focus: support holding, upside targets in view

COMEX copper continues to trade within a constructive technical structure. Following its failure near USD 6.72 per pound on 13 May, prices corrected lower before finding support around USD 6.15, the 31.8% retracement of the March to May rally as well as a former resistance area that has now turned into an important support zone. The successful retest reinforces the broader uptrend, which remains characterised by a sequence of higher highs and higher lows.

As long as copper holds above the USD 6.15 area, the technical outlook remains supportive, with a renewed challenge and break above USD 6.72 opening up for a move towards USD 7.00 per pound, a major psychological milestone. Conversely, a decisive move back below support would weaken the bullish technical picture and raise the risk of a deeper correction, with support - as per the chart - after that being USD 6 followed USD 5.8.

HG Copper - Source: Saxo

The outlook: bullish, but not without risks

Several major investment banks have recently upgraded their copper outlooks. Forecasts for sizeable refined market deficits over the next two years have pushed average price expectations steadily higher, with some analysts now discussing the possibility of prices reaching USD 15,000 per tonne in London against a current price closer to USD 14,000 should supply shortfalls persist.

While supply growth continues to disappoint, strategic demand drivers remain intact, and policy developments are reinforcing concerns about future availability. However, the market is no longer cheap.

Copper is trading close to record levels, and high prices will inevitably test demand elasticity, particularly in China where buyers have historically shown sensitivity to elevated prices. Early signs of slowing orders from parts of the manufacturing sector suggest that some demand destruction risks remain present.

In addition, the outcome of the US tariff review introduces a significant binary risk. While tariff implementation could tighten the market further, a decision not to proceed would likely remove an important source of support.

Ultimately, copper’s long-term story remains one of tightening supply meeting increasingly strategic demand. But after a powerful rally, the next phase is likely to require confirmation from both physical market fundamentals and policy developments. The bull market remains intact, but it has become increasingly dependent on delivering the supply deficits that many now expect.

This content is marketing material and should not be regarded as investment advice. Trading financial instruments carries risks and historic performance is not a guarantee of future results. The instrument(s) referenced in this content may be issued by a partner, from whom Saxo receives promotional fees, payment or retrocessions. While Saxo may receive compensation from these partnerships, all content is created with the aim of providing clients with valuable information and options..
Related articles/content             
1 June 2026: Gold fell again in May as Middle East crisis reshaped market focus 1 June 2026: COT on forex and commodities - Week to 26 May 2026 29 May 2026: Commodities weekly Energy retreat masks deeper supply concerns as metals shine 22 May 2026: Commodities weekly: Oil's grip on macro and markets remain firm 21 May 2026: Oil takes control of markets as diplomacy headlines collide with tightening supply 19 May 2026: Gold Near-term headwinds meet longer-term structural support 18 May 2026: COT on forex and commodities - Week to 12 May 2026 13 May 2026: Grains surge as USDA wheat shock meets biofuel-driven soy demand 12 May 2026: Silver breaks higher as investors rediscover its dual appeal 11 May 2026: COT on forex and commodities - Week to 5 May 2026 8 May 2026: Gold holds firm as central banks and investors look beyond price 3 May 2026: COT on forex and commodities - Week to 28 April 2026 1 May 2026: Commodities rally broadens in April as Middle East disruption tightens global supply chains 30 April 2026: Gold rises with oil as geopolitical risk overwhelms rate headwinds 29 April 2026: Crude rally extends as Strait disruption continues OPECs role tested after UAE exit 28 April 2026: Precious metals face near-term pressure from oil-driven inflation 27 April 2026: COT on forex and commodities - Week to 21 April 2026 24 April 2026: Commodities weekly From fuel shortages to food risks as Hormuz remains shut 22 April 2026: Severe supply disruption meets rising demand destruction as Hormuz closure persists 20 April 2026: COT on forex and commodities - Week to 14 April 2026 14 April 2026: Precious metals rebuild as macro tailwinds return but gold awaits breakout confirmation 13 April 2026: COT on forex and commodities - Week to April 7 2026 10 April 2026: Commodities weekly Energy slumps but physical oil stress keeps the market on edge 9 April 2026: Crude rebounds toward USD 100 as Hormuz bottlenecks keep physical market tight 8 April 2026: Gold correction meets macro reset as ceasefire reverses key headwinds 7 April 2026: Europe's gas market shifts from stress to relief but the real test still lies ahead 7 April 2026: WTI above Brent a curve distortion not a benchmark inversion 7 April 2026: COT on forex and commodities - Week to 31 March 2026 1 April 2026: Commodities monthly Energy surge and second-round effects dominate as metals correct Educational resources: A short guide to trading crude oil The basics of trading wheat online A short guide to trading gold A short guide to trading copper A short guide to trading silver Gold, silver, and platinum: Are precious metals a safe haven investment? Daily podcasts hosted by John J Hardy can be found here
More from the author             
  • Ole S Hansen's articles on Saxo
  • Follow and interact with me on Twitter and BlueSky social media platforms
Ole HansenHead of Commodity StrategySaxo Bank
Topics: Commodities Iran USA Inflation Copper
Gold fell again in May as Middle East crisis reshaped market focus

Posted on: Jun 02 2026

Key points:

  • Gold fell for a third consecutive month in May, albeit at a much reduced pace as the Middle East conflict shifted investor attention towards its broader implications for global energy markets, inflation, the dollar and interest rates
  • Gold tends to perform best during financial or economic shocks that weaken the dollar and lower real yields. The current energy-driven inflation shock has had the opposite effect, supporting yields and the dollar while reducing expectations for rate cuts, thereby creating a headwind for gold.
  • Fiscal debt concerns, de-dollarisation, sticky inflation and not least central bank demand are expected to remain key pillars of support, the latter despite some temporary selling linked to energy-related pressures.

Since hitting a record peak near USD 5,600 in late January, gold has endured a challenging period, with prices falling for a third consecutive month in May, albeit by less than 2%, as the Middle East conflict shifted investor attention towards its broader implications for global energy markets, inflation, the dollar and interest rates. Despite the recent pullback, bullion remains up 5% so far in 2026, 36% over the past year and 91% over the last two years.

The prolonged disruption to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz has kept oil, gas, and refined fuel prices elevated, creating a market environment that has historically been less supportive for gold. Rather than triggering a classic flight to safety, higher energy prices have fuelled inflation concerns, pushed bond yields higher, strengthened the US dollar, and reduced expectations for additional Federal Reserve rate cuts. Together, these developments have created a significant headwind for a non-yielding asset such as gold.

The correction also coincided with a renewed surge in equity markets, particularly across AI-related sectors, reducing investor appetite for alternative assets. At the same time, several energy-importing nations faced rising financing pressures, prompting some central banks to liquidate portions of their gold reserves to support domestic currencies or help offset higher energy costs.

The recent setback once again highlights an important distinction often overlooked by investors. Gold is widely regarded as an inflation hedge, but the nature of the inflation shock matters.

Historically, gold performs best during periods of financial stress or economic weakness when inflation concerns are accompanied by falling real yields and a weakening dollar. The current situation is different. A supply-driven energy shock pushes inflation higher while simultaneously supporting yields and the dollar. This combination can temporarily undermine gold's appeal despite rising consumer prices.

Interest rate expectations remain a key focus among precious metal investors. As a non-interest-bearing asset, gold becomes more attractive when rates fall because the opportunity cost of holding it declines. Conversely, when markets push back expectations for rate cuts, gold often struggles.

This dynamic has been clearly visible over recent months as traders reduced expectations for monetary easing in response to elevated energy prices and persistent inflation risks. However, while interest rate expectations have weighed on sentiment, they are unlikely to remain the dominant driver indefinitely.

Once the geopolitical situation stabilises and the energy shock begins to fade, we expect investors to refocus on the structural themes that have underpinned the bull market in gold over recent years.

Central bank demand remains at the top of that list. While some countries have recently reduced holdings, these sales appear largely tactical rather than strategic. The broader trend of reserve diversification remains firmly intact, particularly among emerging-market central banks that continue to hold relatively small allocations to gold compared with developed economies.

Recent geopolitical developments have, if anything, reinforced the strategic case for gold ownership. Concerns about sanctions risk, reserve diversification, fiscal sustainability, and long-term currency debasement continue to encourage central banks to reduce reliance on traditional reserve assets. We therefore expect central banks to remain net buyers over the coming year.

Chinese demand also remains an important pillar of support. While investor participation has fluctuated alongside broader market sentiment, the longer-term desire among Chinese investors to diversify savings away from property and traditional financial assets continues to support bullion demand. China's central bank increased its gold reserves in April for the sixth consecutive month, likely helping drive a tripling of total gold imports via Hong Kong to 58.6 metric tons.

Meanwhile, fiscal debt concerns across major economies continue to support the investment case for hard assets. Government borrowing levels remain elevated, while the investment requirements associated with electrification, artificial intelligence, energy security, and climate adaptation are likely to keep upward pressure on commodity demand and long-term inflation expectations.

From a technical perspective, gold has so far found strong support near its 200-day moving average, currently located just above USD 4,400 per ounce. The market has tested this level twice during the recent correction and each time attracted renewed buying interest. While this does not eliminate the risk of further short-term weakness, it does suggest that long-term investors remain active beneath the market.

For now, many investors appear content to wait for greater clarity regarding the Middle East conflict before increasing exposure. However, once attention shifts away from the daily fluctuations in energy prices and geopolitical headlines, we believe the market will once again focus on the structural drivers that helped underpin prices in recent years. As a result, we maintain our constructive long-term outlook in the years ahead especially if the trends of reserve diversification, fiscal expansion, and de-dollarisation continue to gather momentum.

 

Gold drivers - Source: Bloomberg & Saxo
Gold, overall in a downtrend since March is currently boxed in between two moving average lines - Source: Saxo
Spot gold - Source: Saxo
This content is marketing material and should not be regarded as investment advice. Trading financial instruments carries risks and historic performance is not a guarantee of future results. The instrument(s) referenced in this content may be issued by a partner, from whom Saxo receives promotional fees, payment or retrocessions. While Saxo may receive compensation from these partnerships, all content is created with the aim of providing clients with valuable information and options..
Related articles/content             
1 June 2026: COT on forex and commodities - Week to 26 May 2026 29 May 2026: Commodities weekly Energy retreat masks deeper supply concerns as metals shine 22 May 2026: Commodities weekly: Oil's grip on macro and markets remain firm 21 May 2026: Oil takes control of markets as diplomacy headlines collide with tightening supply 19 May 2026: Gold Near-term headwinds meet longer-term structural support 18 May 2026: COT on forex and commodities - Week to 12 May 2026 13 May 2026: Grains surge as USDA wheat shock meets biofuel-driven soy demand 12 May 2026: Silver breaks higher as investors rediscover its dual appeal 11 May 2026: COT on forex and commodities - Week to 5 May 2026 8 May 2026: Gold holds firm as central banks and investors look beyond price 3 May 2026: COT on forex and commodities - Week to 28 April 2026 1 May 2026: Commodities rally broadens in April as Middle East disruption tightens global supply chains 30 April 2026: Gold rises with oil as geopolitical risk overwhelms rate headwinds 29 April 2026: Crude rally extends as Strait disruption continues OPECs role tested after UAE exit 28 April 2026: Precious metals face near-term pressure from oil-driven inflation 27 April 2026: COT on forex and commodities - Week to 21 April 2026 24 April 2026: Commodities weekly From fuel shortages to food risks as Hormuz remains shut 22 April 2026: Severe supply disruption meets rising demand destruction as Hormuz closure persists 20 April 2026: COT on forex and commodities - Week to 14 April 2026 14 April 2026: Precious metals rebuild as macro tailwinds return but gold awaits breakout confirmation 13 April 2026: COT on forex and commodities - Week to April 7 2026 10 April 2026: Commodities weekly Energy slumps but physical oil stress keeps the market on edge 9 April 2026: Crude rebounds toward USD 100 as Hormuz bottlenecks keep physical market tight 8 April 2026: Gold correction meets macro reset as ceasefire reverses key headwinds 7 April 2026: Europe's gas market shifts from stress to relief but the real test still lies ahead 7 April 2026: WTI above Brent a curve distortion not a benchmark inversion 7 April 2026: COT on forex and commodities - Week to 31 March 2026 1 April 2026: Commodities monthly Energy surge and second-round effects dominate as metals correct Educational resources: A short guide to trading crude oil The basics of trading wheat online A short guide to trading gold A short guide to trading copper A short guide to trading silver Gold, silver, and platinum: Are precious metals a safe haven investment? Daily podcasts hosted by John J Hardy can be found here
More from the author             
  • Ole S Hansen's articles on Saxo
  • Follow and interact with me on Twitter and BlueSky social media platforms
Ole HansenHead of Commodity StrategySaxo Bank
Topics: Commodities Iran USA Inflation Crude Oil Gold
Snowflake rips, Gold at critical levels.

Posted on: May 29 2026

Snowflake rose over 30% after reporting earnings Wednesday.

Listen to the full episode now or follow the Saxo Market Call on your favourite podcast app.

Links

  • Michael Burry points out that VC has gone whole hog in AI, similar to the situation in 2000 with TMT bubble.
  • Acquired put out a four-hour episode on the fascinating history and phenomenon that is Ferrari - these guys are great. 
  • FT with an exclusive on Ukraine turning the tables in its war with Russia - amazing innovation and rates of production for their at least partially homegrown tech.
  • Stratechery with a brief discussion (paywall) of the SpaceX IPO, both quite dismissive in some ways, but also surprisingly supportive of the idea that space-based data centres could be a thing.

 

Questions and comments, please!

We invite you to send any questions and comments you might have for the podcast team. Whether feedback on the show's content, questions about specific topics, or requests for more focus on a given market area in an upcoming podcast, please get in touch at [email protected].
This content is marketing material and should not be considered investment advice. Trading financial instruments carries risks and historic performance is not a guarantee for future performance. The instrument(s) mentioned in this content may be issued by a partner, from which Saxo receives promotion, payment or retrocessions. While Saxo receives compensation from these partnerships, all content is conducted with the intention of providing clients with valuable options and information.
Saxo Market Call
Saxo Bank
Topics: Podcast Highlighted articles Forex
Australia April CPI preview: Analysts split as conflict costs filter through.

Posted on: May 27 2026

CBA forecasts Australian headline inflation at 4.3% for April while Westpac sees 4.8%, with both banks flagging firm underlying price pressures despite fuel excise relief.

Summary:

  • CBA forecasts annual headline CPI easing to 4.3% in April, with lower fuel prices the primary drag, driven partly by a temporary fuel excise reduction
  • Westpac takes a more hawkish view, forecasting headline CPI rising to 4.8% annually, with holiday travel and clothing and footwear costs pushing prices higher
  • Both banks see trimmed mean inflation holding firm, with CBA forecasting 3.4% annually and Westpac 3.5%; market services inflation estimated at 3.8% by CBA
  • CBA expects quarterly trimmed mean inflation to accelerate to 1.0% in Q2 2026, though flags significant uncertainty around the degree to which firms pass higher costs to consumers
  • April's data is described as a key test of whether inflation pressures from the Iran conflict are widening beyond fuel into the broader economy

Australia's April consumer price index release is shaping up as a pivotal data point for the Reserve Bank, with two of the country's largest lenders split on the headline outcome and both watching closely for signs that inflationary pressures from the Iran conflict are spreading beyond energy costs.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia expects annual headline inflation to ease to 4.3% in April, pulled lower by declining fuel prices following the government's temporary halving of the fuel excise. The relief on transport costs, however, is expected to mask ongoing firmness in underlying price pressures. CBA forecasts the monthly trimmed mean measure rising to 3.4% on an annual basis, with market services inflation running at approximately 3.8%, a level that signals domestic demand-side price dynamics remain far from settled.

Westpac takes a more hawkish view on the headline, forecasting annual CPI accelerating to 4.8%, above the market consensus of 4.4%. The bank attributes the increase to holiday travel costs and clothing and footwear prices, with the fuel excise reduction and free public transport in some states providing only a partial offset. Westpac's trimmed mean forecast of 3.5% annually sits fractionally above CBA's estimate, and the two banks are broadly aligned on the message that underlying inflation is not yet responding meaningfully to the easing of headline energy costs.

For the RBA, the April release carries unusual weight. March data showed limited spillover from the Middle East conflict beyond direct fuel price effects, but both banks flag that early indications of broader cost pass-through are beginning to emerge. The degree to which Australian businesses translate higher input costs into consumer prices in the coming months is identified as the central uncertainty in the outlook.

CBA's expectation of quarterly trimmed mean inflation reaching 1.0% in the second quarter of 2026 underscores the persistence of the problem. With underlying inflation still running well above the RBA's target band, and the central bank having raised rates at each of its three meetings so far this year, the April print will do much to determine whether further tightening remains on the table or whether the hiking cycle is nearing its end.

---

The divergence between CBA's 4.3% and Westpac's 4.8% headline forecasts reflects genuine uncertainty about how quickly Iran conflict-related cost pressures are broadening beyond energy. The fuel excise reduction provides a one-off drag on headline that could flatter the top-line read and complicate the RBA's signal-extraction problem. Trimmed mean estimates are tightly clustered around 3.4-3.5% annually, suggesting underlying price momentum remains the more meaningful policy input. A print above consensus on either measure would reinforce the case for the RBA to extend its hiking cycle; a miss could prompt markets to question whether the three consecutive increases already delivered have done enough. Market services inflation running near 3.8% annually indicates domestic demand-side pressures have not yet dissipated.

This article was written by Eamonn Sheridan at investinglive.com.